Discussion of nuclear-armed Japan

As a continuation of the entry of smiling, this time a little to serious.
I think it may be a hard story, if it is considered an adult If you would like things, until the end of this entry is through the eyes and be at least Moraere.
What sick how much Japan today. He should also know that when you come to.
And, with eyes that determine a person commits the political will to protect yourself and your descendants.
In Suma-sa Taningoto is not anymore.

Sakura's debate on the nuclear-armed channel. Video should look through it once.
Let me explain why.

In general nuclear is bad! But tend to be emotional and emotional story like, nuclear-armed debate is not such a simple story.
Political awareness, diplomacy, economy, power balance, Japanese, etc. common sense in the world.
Nucleus, and so useless to say do not think all sorts of such elements is not only in the discussion of children after all.

Japan is alive in the world.
That is that it is alive in the world is also Japanese.
In considering the pros and cons of nuclear weapons (whether good or bad), and it does not take into account all sorts of elements as described above, there is no meaning at all.
Even more, it "never thought" in the emotional reasons and emotional debate itself of nuclear weapons, the Japanese (That means that your own) the same as it has waived the right to life itself .

Because, you can write loosely Omoikkiri, what is called nation-state have a duty to protect the people, the people you have a right to choose the politicians leave the running of the country (and obligations) are as self-evident. So, that is not even discussed the citizens themselves, "How to protect against the nation" is that it does not even try to protect their own citizens themselves.
As is clear, those who do not try to protect themselves can not take land and resources to hold the gas Looking at the problem and the Senkaku Islands Takeshima, in the East China Sea.
China and South Korea, insists that even the Tsushima its territory. If deprived of territory these people are living in, people who lived there would be residents of the enemy. But overt act of war, is just that.
Tsushima has fallen this time if they want even if you will, Okinawa. His attitude does not matter because I do not live is it shows a lack of imagination on the ill-advised, stupid yet. Why would Apologies for the shortness indifferent to what extent.
Busy work, there is no time to believe that such a thing?
I hear So, what we also get to work immediately in bed right there after work, woke up?
Editors and authors, such as some games are really such a life. Weekly magazine editors had to say my friend has not returned to the home only three days a month. The other day that I realized I slept under the desk, so I sleep in the nap room of the company.
思 busy people really like, and why I do not disturb the physical condition, so to speak, although really, it should not be such a wind up if you have a normal job. I'm one too, and I'm in at most two limit Toru, then will go home the last train in own own taxi. Busy people dying all the time is not so. After a busy period is supposed to be easy.
Way is not my job to write a comment bitches. When home from work, when to take a shower at home, drink a glass of beer before going to bed when. When such, should do us a favor and thought vaguely.
Once a month, once every six months is good.
Interested by all means, please take a look at once. Think in a corner of the head.

Now what that military force is not anything more than just attack. Thing that nuclear arms will become a major deterrent in itself.

Might be seen and get look at it this way.
And trying to walk home and get to the station finally tottering a dim alley in the last train you to work overtime, widely spaced street lights and a terrace.
No way would be attacked and do not think my way home.
Because, because if caught by the police from thinking or struck, and that kind of thing people would not.
However, the person who is not afraid of the police believe, and live without being caught is such a thing without regard to attack you.
Purse-snatching in the street at night, theft injury, hit-and-run, such is the case all that does not solve everything.

You do not have the means to protect themselves.
I only rely on the police.
But, they are attacked.
Because that does not have the means to protect yourself by yourself.

This is the state of Japan today.
It is attacked by Japan. It hit Russia, China, Korea (North Korea is not a threat on the geopolitical reasons)
American policeman.
Moreover, this cop does not work only in convenience, their own.
The United States have a duty to protect the national interests of the United States, not only has signed a security treaty between Japan and the United States in protecting the national interest.
Speaking of Japan, and protect themselves without having to develop on their own troops, not only to security and that Nokka~tsu Fortunately this.

American national power that is on the wane, it could also sank along with Japan and the United States still remains cut to rely on this. When the United States withdrew from the security of Japan, that Japan will be left behind remain unprotected.
In the current Self-Defense Forces, defend it all too long coastline of Japan is impossible, must make such a situation as a strategy is not to be attacked before the offensive.
Speaking in the above example, the same that Japan now have a pocket knife of about 2 cm, and they are walking the streets at night.
What are China's major cities in Japan according to the sighting of a ballistic nuclear missile but as is well known, there is no reason prevent the missile at about pocket knife.
Before that happens, there is a need to have a deterrent on its own and Japan. Such as a permanent member of the Security Council and is also absurd to have no nucleus.
That a nuclear-armed it is like walking home Even with a dark street at night and a policeman.

I think I see you are listening to the video that was introduced in the beginning, that it (including UN) diplomacy is carried out in conformity to certain rules, "It is the power to make rules thinking." But that. Power and say here is that of military force, of course. In some cases, but also of economic strength, not safely assume that on security and military power that the source of power.
In diplomacy, you can reject a rule that is detrimental to themselves for the first time you have a power.
That will make it obvious from the unequal treaties with the powers at the time of the Meiji Restoration.
Rules to protect those with power. I have a rule that protects the weak, not just the side effect "is who has the power method" was also those rules and have a good thought.
Regardless of this point is also very important, the Japanese have not been recognized at all. Have a misunderstanding rather than a. Compliance with rules is a virtue but there is no mistake, if you ignore the power to prop up the rules, your feet will be saved someday.
For example, the increase in crime rate in Japan, will be dealt with as an underpowered solely deterrence. It is always caught and always be punished it's a deterrent to crime. Over the results of police bureaucracy, such as the decline in the number of solved crimes, but the Japanese myth of the so-called safety was gone quickly collapsed. Also for the increase of juvenile crime, it is also familiar to judge strictly as adult under the age of 20, may also reduce crime such as people who also do not think of the children.
This is the power to prop up the (criminal law in this case) (applying police force, of penal provisions) rules.

First there is power, then power to make rules.
Which tends to be confused with that rule is absolute, that may be distorted by power.
In short, he has such power to come first.

There must be at least there is a risk the United States to withdraw from the security of Japan, first consider whether or not it requires a nuclear-armed. For If you were out there is a conclusion that must be armed with nuclear weapons, had to be a constitutional amendment before moving to run, to the constitutional amendment, must obtain the consensus of what is required constitutional amendment why.
Shall be punished by a discussion of whether the body should be how, before the debate to get the consensus of whether you need a constitutional amendment, or how the situation in Japan is now.

So that, considering that nuclear armament is also means that we must reconsider all the problems surrounding Japan.
There are many things to think horribly. This is another very terrible.
Video was introduced at the beginning, which introduced me to a wide range of such part of the comprehensive view.

What sick how much Japan today. He should also know that when you come to.
And, with eyes that determine a person commits the political will to protect yourself and your descendants.
In Suma-sa Taningoto is not anymore.

Slow he is aware that from standing in the dark street at night defenseless.

Random pickup past articles

Loading ...


Related Articles:

Category: Zakki

Tags: , , ,

Re: August 9, 2008 - 18:05 Category: Zakki . Comments can subscribe to this RSS RSS 2.0
This entry response or Trackback is possible.

5 Comments on "discussion of nuclear-armed Japan"

Aristocrats 21:24 - August 9, 2008

Threatened at knife-point to strangers when walking street at night.
Finally realize that the danger had become imminent to him at that time.
80% not 70% of Japanese things like?
What to expect in a cabinet reshuffle? "I want to somehow gasoline" is Obachan was accused and
Japan said it would calmly and the like.
Mother of the said half in jest or or "I have" Japan "into the Self-Defense Forces in order to protect themselves" or "run away to subway" from when I is small, but had been treated weirdo from the surrounding sorry story as a joke anymore.

Yue semi five past seven p.m. - August 10, 2008

Such talk is, it may be thought of more things and to understand the relationship between countries and economic and religious and military forces and military alliance.
For example, North Korea (you can see just by a little research), North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the Shanghai Treaty Organization is located in the cooperation in the religious side it is located in an important position for a Middle East strategy.
Although blowing the fire actually Oshiraku option, you can also neglect the north and can not think of the Middle East.
Fundamentally, recognize a nuclear-armed country to Nippon monkey for a terrorist organization is nothing I would, you would simply provide the reason for the economic sanctions.
Oh, after the military alliance is with respect to w It is also required in terms of production and technology equipment to be used for weapons
China is talking about that ..., w for world affairs after 9.11 will be obsolete the idea of ​​Russia
First, Some people have advocated the conspiracy theory China, only capitalism and communism are no longer thinking critically enough.
W It is also available without a nuclear-armed hand, it becomes like Singapore
For troops over there I will not need any explanation.
Well, now the government was too particular about family abduction at a meeting in six countries want to somehow the proliferation of nuclear weapons to the Middle East before Oshiraku options occurs again I feel that w ... which is the
Donimo, do you say public opinion itself, the narrow field of view of the media will care.
A-WACS also has the United States also Russia and Japan, more than there is a balance with NATO, it does not get invaded the independent state is also Russia and China.
What it, as long as Japan is not repeated in a suicide attack in China and Russia.
The two countries, we are fighting Islamic insurgents and Japanese have more than I thought my brother.

Gale 05:14 - August 11, 2008

> After my aunt sent to China together Kuge's annoying, China w must have surely intimidated
Not a good mother. Because of the very education that one little bit from now on
> ~ Welcome to semi's
Discussion are welcome. It also increases knowledge.
However, I only collect information intensive two weeks once a year at most, but does not mean so much more.
The above entry is so "story for beginners" so-called, w Long story short there is only prominently
Well.
I called about the strategy involved in the Middle East, North Korea would be of donor or nuclear technology?
I called it, was in possession of nuclear technology to North Korea is thought suspicious. While every effort has been made to North Korea nuclear test in 2006, it is a nuclear bomb, to mean that nuclear testing completed in just one will not go. If you do not repeat the experiment several times at least, can not hold a nuclear bomb (trusted militarily at least) practical. In India and 13 (twice) (three times), in Pakistan is a nuclear test and 30 days (5 times) of (1 time) 28 May 1998 May 1974 May 11, 1998, actually We are. Subcritical nuclear test (subcritical nuclear test) is often carried out to update the data in the United States.
Whether you are a computer simulation of the experiment subcritical, nuclear test once because sufficient data can not be removed, simply by observing the "seismic waves which are considered" nuclear explosion of just one, a nuclear bomb North Korea You thought it was "owned" and rashness.
In addition, the estimated scale of what is North Korea's nuclear test, the measurement result that has come out less than 1 kiloton.
Small-scale nuclear test explosion and then the following ... [t TNT1000 nuclear development is weak;
http://www.chosunonline.com/article/20061010000039
Seismic wave analysis of the event is estimated to be North Korea's nuclear test on October 9, 2006 (revision 2)
http://www.geo.tsukuba.ac.jp/press_HP/yagi/EQ/20061009NorthKorea/
This is as a nuclear explosion is abnormally small scale, can be well disguised by the TNT explosion if 0.5kt ~ 0.8kt. Given normally, such as the impersonation of economic sanctions to induce nuclear test is madness, in the Akashic records of the reasons for the nuclear test impersonation guess has been made. Incidentally, the Akashic Record is a site that affected me most. Please try to read through some of the time even when it interesting.
Depth of the "nuclear test impersonation" North Korea
http://www.akashic-record.com/y2006/fakenk.html
Nuclear technology is immature like this, and can be an indispensable technology for Iran's nuclear development is difficult to believe, therefore, that North Korea has a large specific gravity or in the Middle East strategy would not be hard to believe it. Impact is considered does not mean nothing, of course, but a relatively minor impact, and very.
About Oshiraku options then.
Runaway of Israel is nothing new, America is moving motion in the direction of separating the Israel currently, Israel deepen the isolation, we have a groping towards the peace with Arab countries including Syria is. Order be considered in such circumstances is to recur Oshiraku options, and it when it is no longer fit holding the military of Israel, and the breakdown is peace, when away, but try to donor nuclear technology to North Korea to happen happen will. Israel lobby in America can comeback to power, the situation is changed also be familiar to come to Israel again fully supports the U.S. is considered sufficient, is opaque at the moment. There is a focus at say by North Korea policy, relevance, and determines how much, and whether sooner is (? Impatience of Israel) that period, on leaving it with paper, because it comes also involved trends in the United States, Leave the place called need to consider as an option, will be discussed in separate if necessary.
I believe (which is already dead) while superfluous, the latch does not resolve the way. I think before changing to the Aso Cabinet, and whether it is not the time come to light does not affect the general election.
The back and forth
> Story ... that China is for the state of the world after 9.11 w will be an outdated way of thinking Russia
W outrageous unwillingly
I called the fight against terrorism is nothing more than a label that put the United States.
This is not conspiracy theory or, terrorism is happening now also unchanged from the previous 911. It has been closed up in recent years despite, the 911 is exactly what happened because, to close up the fight against terrorism ahead of the fight in Iraq was good because it is convenient. If you show a simple example, it has happened the World Trade Center bombing in 1993. Same despite the U.S. mainland was attacked, why did not declare the fight against terrorism at this time why?
On the other hand, it is a tool of thinking that the geopolitical strategy still valid, it is a mistake to think out-of-date.
Although it called terrorist force to cause social unrest is, except in the Middle East about the power of the system is not upset.
Respect of Islamic terrorism, I argue in the same category in the furnace and Japan would be funny. Just say it has been fighting with the forces of Islamic Russia and China, and it is a short Islamic forces just log in, and does not recognize Islam as a country. Thus, it can be said is the need cause Islamic terrorism in Japan is unlikely. Otherwise, this monkey who guard the nation, has not happened until now is strange. I think that the primary goal and effective terrorism, but the police are guarding rather than the Self-Defense Forces, I'll do anything not happening the most. Only before and after visiting at least at the ministerial level, such as national forces hostile to Islam and would be risky when in the womb of time, or to participate in military action against Islamic forces. So, you might be better thought that Sleeper is already infiltrated, uncovered pre-Sleeper so will very difficult.
True in Japan, but Islamic terrorism is alarming things, and be nothing to make a strategy based on it from that described above.
> There is more balance with NATO, it does not get invaded the independent state is also Russia and China.
Geopolitical perspective, Russia is seeking land power outlet to the sea is always the land power that blocked the exit to Japan and Taiwan and China as well. And say Japan is located in the position as a sea power sequence and the United States, should be against the Land Power, the relationship between these positions is, of course, no different from the era of Meiji was the Russo-Japanese War Sino On the other hand.
Russia does not have to deal with current affairs and Islam, China is not having a spark of civil war in various places, to reason that you do not have to also prepare for what will not be Dakaratoitte Japan.
After the Second World War, the Cold War balance of power begins with, due to the collapse of the Soviet Union after the end of the Cold War, the military balance has become unstable. America performs disarmament by reducing military spending, no longer have only less than half of the heyday of expansion capability. As a result, the total strength (quality aside) by China's vast modernization has made the threat of China is growing. Has focused on Russian arms in recent years at the same time, its threat level is both the other hand.
But do not know if that points to what specifically is it that the balance with NATO, there was no invasion particularly large for the purpose of the invasion of an independent nation since WW2 can be thought of as just did not have a chance that simply . Dispatch proxy war or military purposes, the so-called punitive expedition against it is happening frequently. This is called the dispatch that it is possible to truncate if any (looks like) legitimate reasons, and impossible to see and is very dangerous military.
May seem impossible to talk like the current world situation has been relatively stable since, but that the military is put on the assumption that the worst option would of course also including national defense.
> Fundamentally, recognize a nuclear-armed country to Nippon monkey for a terrorist organization is nothing I would,
> Will be to provide a simple reason of economic sanctions.
Yes. For security will need to change the law to hit the SDF. I think things can not go in thinking about nuclear weapons, and unless you have discussed above as well.
However, economic sanctions that nuclear armament is a short-sighted = surprisingly, in the case of Japan by the condition does not apply.
First, the nuclear-armed dictatorship and democracy is why the administration is different.
Secondly, Japan has to a certain third (external perspective) descriptive, and that the threat posed by nuclear North Korea and China, against nuclear armament of Japan Limited, out of sprinkling is acceptable remarks from the U.S. is that.
What are you saying earlier, McCain was in favor of nuclear power in Japan is a famous story.
I called North Korea's nuclear threat, and secondly because of the claims I mentioned above do not correspond. However, when viewed from the perspective from abroad, North Korea is not "supposed to" have a nucleus, this will be that you can use the image of a democratic nation is exposed to the threat of nuclear weapons .
Video was introduced at the beginning of this entry, there was a remark that six party talks that there may be aiming to suppress the nuclear armament of Japan. If this is a clear threat of nuclear weapons such as the above, it is run on a nuclear-armed Japan in light of common sense that because of the international "norm". Is why we say.
This is why very convincing. It can not be helped when it is taken to have a military deterrent is necessary for national defense duty of course as a nation, and no intention to defend the nation if not done this is common sense in the world. Military deterrence against the threat of nuclear weapons because it is only nuclear-armed, it is run in a nuclear-armed Japan is that of course. It is in the sense that the world standpoint. Just in case.
That there may be intended by a party of the United States to remove the nuclear threat of North Korea in six party talks, that attempts to prevent the nuclear armament of Japan there. That it is the meaning of that remark.
Therefore, one can expect even ran into a nuclear-armed Japan, would be helped seems to be no, it is unlikely that economic sanctions are not immediate. After Japan's economic blockade the first place, bring immeasurable damage to the world economy, because it is too obvious.
However, I need a consensus-building is certainly prudent to move and when armed with nuclear weapons actually.
Year. Simply to talk little bit, because I become this much, you know I often need to consider more extensively What really when it comes to actually study.
It is also munitions production infrastructure, even if only to enhance the normal armaments, arms exports do not even have to think in order to reduce manufacturing costs. I have also finished the most difficult to reform public awareness.
> Donimo, do you say public opinion itself, the narrow field of view of the media will care.
I agree completely. Deplorable.
Out there is a gourmet corner in the news programs I will not. From time to time, the same will be ashamed to be Japanese.
I want to write is still a bit sleepy so truly sleep muscle. It was fun since it is less if someone decent to the discussion. Now studying various. D: also regards

Semi Yue 00:20 - August 12, 2008

Because the established right of self-defense under international law, from the perspective of defense armaments Hey is not particularly problematic.
Nucleus of the north ... this is the same as the weapons of the United States, will increase the reliability by hand to get used to provide to other countries.
Also bore off the site, and then feel like I was from the first IAF.
For the second option Oshiraku in September of last year, the facility is that it is "opinion" of the IAEA only (manufactured by North Korea is a strong suspicion, but now gone to a vacant lot is also evidence because it does not say anything)
Saeretto-Matokaru thing brought back was tentatively made by North Korea.
So, we have recurrence last year. Option position that was supposed to be also effective against Iran.
And possibly the United States is not so might just want to somehow because I hate to invoke the nuclear option in the north flows into the Middle East.
A terrorist organization by itself is weak, or get a weapon What the future will be the network of terrorist groups now feel so pretty huge.
Incidentally, at the time when Oshiraku options, father Bush, so much had been advising the economic sanctions to rage in earnest, if Israel attacks against nuclear facilities, is isolated further and do not grasp the United States also evidence I will purchase w
As for the war invasion is not clear what definition is even now, before it, if you actually wake up, but so is Russia and China in particular, economic ties will be the stumbling block.
(Conversely, it is also possible to conduct a military attack less likely to deepen the exchanges in economy)
It is the economic impact ... This is the case of Japan is under attack.
But ... what to take and the invasion of an independent nation, I have started from a war economy since the first look at WW2.
War may not be discussed in the geopolitics ... only.
It is the only economy that does not work, try, w it is the only religion that does not work, try
Incidentally, I personally Shanghai Treaty Organization that it can function properly? That I will.
I have an idea to understand, there is any (at the time was Shanghai Five), but was also not from the Afghan War.
We do not make the information in there is I will care.
China in particular.
Ah, you say, that you mention it, since the flow of information of Aegis, the attitude of the United States for military technology and has changed 180 degrees.
He does not want to do it w also sell F-22
Emotionally, "nuclear is bad" w I want missing or loose
Nucleus is also the opposition, I think if that does not have a nucleus, and it must be equipped accordingly.
What do you need some like Titan Corporation ...
It is useless even though I only AWACS.
We'll need a fleet mobility.
> Donimo, do you say public opinion itself, the narrow field of view of the media will care.
W often think Japanese people, you have a base where the U.S. Pacific Fleet, and I would not have to worry about or are participating in the strategy of where
In that sense, the United States but would not want to let go of the Japan ...

Gale 02:51 - August 14, 2008

Oh. So to take Bon holiday Other, you plunged into the hair creating all the time anyway move.
So, is expected to be less since the 18th. Sunmasen.

Comment